Senior, fractional operational consultancy supporting defence, government, and security-conscious organisations where decisions matter more than theory.
I provide independent, senior operational support to organisations facing complex risk, cyber, and capability decisions - particularly where internal teams, large consultancies, or vendors lack real-world operational perspective. This work draws on direct experience of making operational decisions under pressure - and living with the consequences.
I help organisations make sense of risk, cyber exposure, and operational context before committing to change, investment, or action.
Rapid diagnostic of cyber and operational risk
Scenario-led workshops for senior leaders
Assessment of decision environments, pressures, and failure points
Translation of technical risk into operational impact
I help leaders and teams structure decisions, governance, and behaviour so that good judgement survives real-world pressure. This focuses on authority, accountability, escalation structures, and how decisions hold up when information is incomplete.
Executive and senior-leader briefings
Leadership and decision-focused workshops
Decision frameworks and governance design
Alignment of people, authority, and accountability
I stress-test decisions, capabilities, and systems under realistic conditions - so leaders know what will hold up, and what will fail, before it matters.
This work surfaces failure points early, when they're still politically and operationally survivable. It provides independent, evidence-based assurance that goes beyond documentation or vendor claims.
Capability, equipment, and systems trials
Wargaming and deployment simulations
Stress-testing under realistic pressure and constraints
Acting as informed operational user, not passive observer
Interpreting Statements of Requirement (SOR) against actual performance
Identifying where assumptions, governance, or behaviour break down
Who I amAfter 35 years leading delivery across NATO deployments, programme leadership, and capability trials, I established DWC Consultant Ltd in January 2026.Former Director of Operations responsible for 200 personnel, multi-million pound budgets, and mission-critical systems delivery.Experienced in briefing Military personnel at 4* level, Ministers, Permanent Undersecretaries both at home and internationally, cutting through the noise to deliver clarity in a congested arena.Qualifications: APM Project Management, MSc Leadership & Management, BEng Telecommunications Systems Engineering, Safety Risk Management Practitioner.
Work with meWhat I provide: direct experience making critical decisions when outcomes matter - not frameworks, not vendor solutions.If you're preparing for a trial, facing uncertainty, or need independent assessment - let's have a conversation.Engagements are typically structured as 5-20 day projects: rapid diagnostics, leadership workshops, or trials evaluation.Recent work: Cyber-operational decision-making for overseas defence and security organization (see case study SENSE).Working with: Defence and security organizations, MOD, defence primes, telecommunications providers, critical infrastructure operators, and government programmes.
Available for short-term engagements, advisory work, and capability trials in the UK and internationally.
DWC Consultant Ltd
-•• •-- -•-•
Registered in Northern Ireland · Company No. NI736868
Registered Office: Office 1612, 92 Castle Street, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT1 1HE+44 7346 809161-•• •-- -•-•
Case Study
Cyber Security & Operational Decision-Making
Context
An overseas defence and security organization had a problem: their leaders understood cyber as a technical issue, but couldn't connect it to the operational decisions they actually made.Personnel responsible for planning, coordination, and command needed to understand how cyber incidents affect real operations - not at a technical level, but in terms they could act on. What does it look like when things go wrong? What decisions actually matter under pressure?The challenge wasn't just working out where the gaps were. It was helping them fix it.
What They Needed
The organization needed their leadership team to be able to:
Understand who was actually targeting them and how attacks happen in practice
Recognize operational failure when cyber incidents occur - not just "the network is down" but degraded command, disrupted logistics, damaged morale, loss of public confidence
Make practical protection decisions under time pressure
Talk about cyber risk in operational terms rather than technical jargon
This wasn't about delivering information. It was about changing how they thought and decided.
Approach
I structured the work around three questions:
Threat - Do leaders understand who the adversaries are and where the real vulnerabilities sit?
Effect - Can they connect cyber incidents to operational consequences?
Protect - Do they know which decisions actually matter under pressure?
The engagement combined scenario-based decision work, case study analysis, and structured discussion.Rather than teaching them what to think, I wanted to show them how cyber-operational incidents actually unfold and what that means for their decisions.I deliberately avoided technical depth. The question was whether they could make sound decisions when cyber and operations collide - not whether they could define zero trust or explain how phishing works.Delivered to 15 personnel responsible for planning and coordination functions, where operational decisions directly affected activity and outcomes.
What I Did
The work ran over several sessions over 5 days and included:
Scenario discussion where leaders worked through decisions under simulated pressure
Case studies of real incidents to show the operational patterns they needed to recognize
Interactive exercises that demonstrated identity compromise, defender fatigue, layered defence, and decision-making under uncertainty
Facilitated reflection on what was working and what wasn't
Discussion of practical protections that actually matter
The sessions were designed to make the decision pressures visible rather than theoretical. Leaders needed to see what failure looked like and practice working through it.
What Changed
By the end of the engagement, leaders had:
A clearer mental model of how cyber incidents unfold and affect operations
Better understanding of how cyber risk connects to command, logistics, morale, and national resilience
Greater awareness of identity, access, and human factors in operational security
Practical insight into layered defence and what decisions matter under pressure
A shared vocabulary for discussing cyber risk at the right level
The consistent feedback was that cyber security made sense in a way it hadn't before—and that it was directly connected to the decisions they were actually making.
What They Got
The organization received practical guidance they could use:
Reference material covering the Threat-Effect-Protect framework
Decision guides for cyber-operational scenarios
Case study summaries showing operational patterns to watch for
Structured notes from the sessions
These weren't theoretical documents. They were tools the organization could actually refer back to when making decisions under pressure.
Format
Multi-session structured engagement
Scenario-based decision work
Interactive practical exercises
Facilitated discussion and reflection
Supporting guides and reference material.This sits within Sense work: helping organizations understand cyber-operational risk before committing to action. The engagement combined assessment and capability development—working out what leaders understood, then helping them improve their decision-making under pressure.
